The End...
Christmas
is coming, so the fall semester will comes to an end. I experienced a fall
semester that was the total opposite of a semester in Amsterdam. Especially the
class structure and the weekly deadlines in this course let me feel like I was
in high school again. As I have wrote in an earlier post, the fall semester in
Amsterdam consists of two 8-week courses and one 4-week course. Now that it is
the end, I can say that I believe that I have learned more in certain topics
than that I would have done back in Amsterdam.
The build
up of study material in courses that last the entire semester, such as our
course, is more clearly compared to a stuffed 8-week course. I liked the build
up of the study material in this course. It started quite easy with the Efficiency
Principle with the Game Theory and the Efficiency and Equity Concepts. These
concepts weren’t new for me and I was afraid that I wouldn’t learn a lot of new
concepts. However, as the semester went on, and especially after the last
change to drop and add classes, the topics that were treated were new and more
challenging.
Topics, in the middle of the
semester, that were challenging for me were Math of Risk & Risk Preference,
Insurance under Asymmetric Information and Bargaining. I learned a lot from
these concepts. Furthermore I really liked the use of graphs and the need to
understand these graphs, which was really useful.
The principle-agent model and Shapiro Stiglitz
model, at the end of the semester, were totally new for me. Both of them were
more challenging than previous topics, but with the experiences on the excel
homework during the semester I managed to complete them. As you see, the build
up of the study material throughout the course was good and in correct order.
Not only
have I learned a lot from the excel homework assignments, but the class session
and online blogging were useful too. I enjoyed the discussion mode in the class
session, even when I wasn’t really into talking much during some days. Most of
the sessions started with a recap of the excel homework (Thursdays) or the
blogging (Tuesdays), followed by the discussion mode on a new topic. I found
the discussion mode very helpful to connect topics with each other and see
topics from a different point of view than only the excel homework. The excel
homework’s felt really theoretical and in the discussion mode these topics
‘came to life’.
Through online blogging we could fit
the class topics into real life situations and use our own experiences. This
was the first time that I faced this kind of study method and this gave some
difficulties in the beginning. However, throughout the semester I got better
and better in blogging and I even found it more enjoyable than in the
beginning. The feedbacks on the blogs were useful and interesting to read and
reply on. The most I get from blogging is the improvement of my English and the
way to interpret theoretical problems into own experiences. Besides, I
encourage the soft deadline policy on the blogging. My busy days were often
Wednesday and Thursday and this made it hard to deliver a good written blog at
Friday noon. So due to the soft deadlines, I was able to write my blogs often
at Fridays or Saturdays.
Sometimes
it was difficult to connect the topics discussed in class and treated in the
excel homework and in blogging, to each other. Often there was an overlap,
however sometimes several subjects were mixed up. Having a weekly main subject
could maybe prevent this. For example, give every week a topic; week 3: Game
Theory, week 6: Bargaining and week 8 could be Asymmetric Information.
Another thing that I would have
liked to see is a one-on-one meeting when we received the half semester
feedback and grades. If it was possible in time, we could have given every
person a 5 minutes time slot during a class session to discuss the individual
overall progress in the class, blogging and excel homework. In the beginning of
the course, it was clear what you, as a teacher, expected from us. However,
throughout the semester this could change. Students have different goals and by
communicating these goals in such a one-to-one meeting, the progress of individual
students could be improved.
My two main
goals were improving my English writing and experiencing the American way to
approach of Economics in Organizations. I am satisfied with my standing at the
end of the semester. I experienced a way of teaching that I never had before.
Back in Amsterdam, we often got one final exam in week 8 that often counts for
80 to 100% of your grade. In general, students don’t show up for 6 weeks and
start studying 24/7 in week 7 and 8 and still pass their course. I realize that
the study material will not stick as good as the way it does here. On the other
hand, in Amsterdam we have lectures and workgroups in one week from different professors
and this gives a lot of advantages.
I truly
believe that I learned a lot in this course. By using different methods to
approach study topics, the subjects got more realistic instead of theoretical.
Furthermore I believe that this course helped me improving my scientific
thinking. Maybe I won’t see the results immediately, but I am sure that once I
experience blogging or a discussion mode again, that I will think back to this
course. I want to thank you for the enjoyable class sessions, which I attended
with pleasure. I experienced the American way to approach Economics in
Organizations at fullest because of your great experiences from the past. I am
just at the start of experiences organizations and I hope to use the knowledge learned
in our classes in the future.
I wish you and
your family a very nice Christmas. Furthermore, I am not a baseball fan, but I hope
for you that the Yankees will come further next year!
- Rutger
Thank you for the comments. Having an exchange student makes the course more interesting for me because, as you said, some of the patterns are different and you bring those things out in overt way. Last year I also had an exchange student. He worked for Ikea and was good natured, like you are. So that part is a plus, in my view.
ReplyDeleteI will say that you shouldn't treat our class as typical of the American way, either for teaching undergraduate economics or undergraduate education in general. You won't find many econ classes that are similar in style, for at least two reasons. It is very unlikely that other such courses would emphasize informal writing, like in the blogging you did, and it is very unlikely that an instructor would spend so much time responding to students this way, for the obvious reason that the instructor teaches many more students than I teach, either in a large lecture course or in several smaller classes. So I wonder if you are taking any other Econ classes here and, if so, how those went for you.
Regarding some of the details you talked about - one big exam at the end versus lots of assignments all the way through - there are two issues to think about that you can tie into our class. One is about the time path of effort. The high stakes exam approach is likely to produce low intensity during much of the term and then a big burst of effort near the end. The other approach is likely to make effort more uniform over the entire semester. While it may be that some things can be mastered by cramming, other subject matter requires repeated exposure and letting the ideas percolate for a while till the student can make sense of them. Now, the implementation of this matters, quite a lot. If students perceive the weekly assignments to be busy work only, nothing more, then they'll do them with minimal effort, So the assignments need to be interesting and challenging to get the desired result.
The other issue is on managing student stress and whether the students come to feel they are being nurtured by the instruction they are getting or if instead they fell they are being assaulted by it. Since your course project was on implicit contracts, you envision that nurture is part of the implicit contract between the student and the university. In that sense, if the students comes to think of the assessments as too harsh, that would indicated a break in the implicit contract and the students would respond in kind.
As your partner for the class project, it was very interesting to hear your perspectives on the course as an exchange student and how things here differ from your home in Amsterdam. I had never before worked on a project that required as much work as this one with someone from another country, and I am grateful for that experience.
ReplyDeleteI liked what you said about having a one-on-one meeting with Professor Arvan during the middle of the semester to assess goals and discuss progress in the course. For me, this class had more moving parts (Excel HW, blogging, blog comments, quizzes, etc.) than many of my other courses which have a uniform homework assignment each week and periodic tests. Because of that, I felt it more difficult to manage each of these aspects of the course and a meeting in the middle to make sure I was on track could've helped.